![]() |
Main Index Search Register Login Who's Online FAQ Links | ![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
|||
![]() |
||||
1 Online, 0 Active | You are not logged in |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Tryptamine Chemistry | Thread: Previous Forum index Next | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
All posts | Subject: Solvents For Amide Synthesis | Please login to post | ![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||
Bubbleplate (Hive Bee) 10-10-04 16:26 No 535200 |
![]() |
Solvents For Amide Synthesis | ||||||
Most of the procedures for the "Carbonyldiimidazole" reaction to produce LSD specify DimethylFormamide (DMF) as the solvent to run it in. A few articles I've run across regarding Peptide Coupling Agents, (for instance http://www.peptide-and-dna.com/marder.pdf ) it is suggested that Choloroform or DCM may be better solvents to carry out the reaction in. The above article says "If the activation is carried out in a solvent of low dielectric constant such as CHCl3 or CH2Cl2, the formation of {the carbodiimide} occurs instaneously...... However, if the activation is carried out in a more Polar solvent such as DMF, no immediate reaction can be detected and a complex mixture..." My question is, while the article is about Peptide coupling, would this also be applicable to the Lysergic Acid/N,N-Carbonyldiimidazole reaction? Also, in general, does using solvents of low dielectric constant, like DCM or Choloform, have any potential downside ? |
||||||||
![]() |
![]() |