Main Index Search Register Login Who's Online FAQ Links | ||||
1 Online, 0 Active | You are not logged in |
|
Novel Discourse | |||
All 7 posts | Subject: Sonochemistry | Please login to post | Down | |||||
xeno_tropic (Stranger) 09-10-03 12:00 No 458157 |
Sonochemistry | |||||||
Patent EP1238715 The above patent goes into exotic details of enhancing the effectiveness of sonochemistry, but it doesn't have to be so complicated. A 555 timer IC chip could produce the 20 or 20+KHz signal (see Forrest Mims' mini-books at Radio Shack, "555 Timer Circuits", etc.), then a suitable amplifier (plans and datasheets everywhere, op amps, jfet, mosfet) could provide the power levels. Transucers are available everywhere also. As with other chemical equipment, the price of ready made is sky high and inflated to the nth degree. I mean, yes, it has space-age contours and specially-formed stainless steel, however a transducer attached to the outside of a flask could easily suffice, and in fact I have seen pics of that very type of setup. It's too bad there isn't more on espacenet and pubmed. I frequently find, as time has progressed (see literature and patents), chemists have adopted more complicated, expensive and dangerous methods to "keep up with the Joneses", much as in other branches of science, abandoning simple cheap methods. Sonochemistry must work too well and be too simple. As I heard in a good movie recently, some people "are just too hip to be happy". I may try it sometime in some months, as one of the precursors I'm interested is a bit pricey for my taste, but tricky to make, my way, due to steric hindrance and the general inactivity of the moiety. I've read sonochemistry can increase some chemical reaction rates a million fold, and shorten reaction times spectacularly. I was also thinking, on the subject of ready-made vs homemade equipment, that a reaction kettle is perfect (but, sticker shock awaits those who look for them) for most things, easier to clean out than a flask, more balanced to help prevent embarrassing and dangerous breakage accidents, plenty of room for a large stirrer, multiple inlets, flat-bottomed to obviate the need for a mantle, etc. I thought of making a lid/stopper for a beaker out of rubber or a chem- and heat-resistant plastic. |
||||||||
Vitus_Verdegast (Hive Bee) 09-10-03 21:23 No 458232 |
Homemade ultrasonics devices, good idea! | |||||||
I have been pondering on that subject too for some time. What would be nice is to use a small piezo transducer, coat with a layer of Teflon, to make an ultrasonic probe that could be immersed in the rxn mixture. I've read an interesting paper somewhere about precipitating metals in ultrasonic environment, it give a very finely divided and much more reactive metal powder. Ideal for eg. making ppt. Ni/kieselguhr catalyst. I'll try to find the paper again. A Dream Within A Dream (http://www.poedecoder.com/Qrisse/works/dreamw.html) |
||||||||
xeno_tropic (Stranger) 09-11-03 10:41 No 458389 |
Sonochemistry | |||||||
Anyone who has a computer and/or a CD player has a third of the equipment neccesary (signal generator). There is a software called GoldWave which will allow one to make any waveforms and any frequency up to a certain point. I think it goes up to 20,000 (20KHz). Sine waves or square waves (also makeable with GWave) are probably efficacious. There are many other waveform editing softwares, but to me, GWave is king. 4000 free commands, then $40 to register. I use it to make and edit signals for mind-altering electronic devices. Modulation with white noise might help. Nature is comprised of noisy, nonlinear systems. Chemistry is no exception. These signals can be recorded on CD at a 44.1KHz sampling rate. Just plug the CD player into an amp with an upper freq limit of +20KHz and sufficient power, plug in a shielded transducer, and voila! I have read that scratching the side of a glass vessel with a glass rod will cause the beginning of crystallization in a solution of a compound contained in the vessel. Perhaps this sound would help with other reactions. It is also said that burst-firing lasers (a burst of pulses, then a moment of no pulses, repeat cycle) is more effective in cutting materials than an unchanging laser beam. It wouldn't surprise me if this held true with sonochemistry also. |
||||||||
hest (Hive Adickt) 09-11-03 11:51 No 458403 |
ultrasound | |||||||
You will need much more pover than a usual speaker will generate. Red this one Post 247296 (hest: "Re: initiating Grignards with ultrasonic ...", Chemistry Discourse) |
||||||||
xeno_tropic (Newbee) 09-11-03 20:30 No 458458 |
Sonochemistry - Power Levels | |||||||
Yes, 150 watts is a lot, and, with piezo transducers, one has to be careful, exposure to high levels of ultrasound can harm or kill animals and people. Cell disruption and ultrasonic welding are, I suppose, somewhat different than sonochemistry. The Thomas Register contains a list of manufacturers/sellers. I will look further into it. |
||||||||
Vitus_Verdegast (Hive Bee) 09-11-03 23:46 No 458498 |
Power, resistance and amplitude | |||||||
|
||||||||
fanofshulgin (Stranger) 10-13-03 10:55 No 464386 |
Scratching inside a glass vessel to promote... | |||||||
Scratching inside a glass vessel to promote crystallization has nothing to do with the sound produced. It is believed that the scratching generates tiny particles of glass that act as nucleation centres for crystals to form. Peace, love and empathy |
||||||||